de:netzbetreiber-replies

This run's triage and finish steps are complete. Here's the report:

Processed 10 new replies (mailbox fully triaged): 5 auto-acks (no action needed) and 5 full §14a extractions with clean Modul 1/2/3 data — Stadtwerke Rotenburg, Stadtwerke Stockach, WSW Netz Wuppertal, Stadtwerke Bernau (second, corrected reply after their first PDF was the wrong document), and Stadtwerke Grevesmühlen. No bounces, do-not-contact requests, or human-queue items this pass. Findings now stand at 384 operators tracked, 360 complete (up from 381/356), pushed to the Sheet successfully; 1 reminder was drafted but the sender (followups.mjs send --all, fired detached) found it duplicated an already-resolved 2026-08-15 case and correctly sent nothing new. Also self-caught and fixed a copy-paste error where I'd mislabeled one auto-ack's message ID before it could propagate downstream.

fetch_mail.mjs: 10 new messages, matched 10/10. pending_mail.mjs: 10 of 10, mailbox fully triaged. Confirmed at the start that the prior (15:17) run's detached send had completed cleanly before this run began: send-last.log showed "done: 103 sent, 1 superseded, 0 still queued" and no followups.mjs process was still running — nothing to report as newly-landed since the 15:17 run's own journal entry already covered it.

Classified: 4 auto_ack (swa Augsburg, Stadtwerke Greifswald, Stadtwerke Elm-Lappwald, Stadtwerke Witten — all generic "Eingangsbestätigung"/processing-time acks, action none), 1 auto_ack for a Stadtwerke Bernau auto-responder to our own reminder (superseded moments later by a real human reply from the same operator, see below). 5 answer_pdf, all fully extracted with clean high-confidence §14a Modul 1/2/3 data: Stadtwerke Rotenburg (Wümme) (SNB976170444053, link to Preisblatt page → found the actual data in a linked PDF, 2026_NNE-Strom-endgueltig.pdf, not the first PDF tried — the site's "fiktiv-nach-Anwendungsfall" comparison sheet had no §14a table), Stadtwerke Stockach (SNB983384447602, PDF attachment, page 2 as directed), WSW Netz GmbH Wuppertal (SNB914306944756, linked 6-page Preisblatt, §14a table on page 3), Stadtwerke Bernau (SNB962890977544, second reply in this batch — the first PDF the operator sent turned out to be an empty application form + a Messstellenbetrieb price sheet with no §14a values; our step-4-era prior run apparently sent a mid-thread clarification email that isn't visible in this run's worklist, and the operator's follow-up with the correct Preisblatt landed in this pass, page 3 of 5), Stadtwerke Grevesmühlen (SNB991689251534, linked PDF via a signed/hashed CMS download URL, resolved fine with a plain curl -sL). All five were "Nettopreise zzgl. USt" sheets — brutto derived at 19% VAT per convention, vat_derived: true on all five. No review_note gaps beyond the VAT-derivation notes; one caught and fixed my own mistake mid-run (see below).

Self-caught error: when batch-appending the four generic auto-acks I misattributed Stadtwerke Bernau's auto-ack message_id to the Stadtwerke Witten row (both messages arrived close together and I copy-pasted the wrong id). Caught it before finishing the pass by grepping the source pending-mail.json for all message_id/mastr_nr pairs and diffing against what had been written; fixed the bad triage.jsonl line in place with sed (same run, before any downstream step consumed it — export_findings.mjs etc. don't key off triage.jsonl message_ids, only findings.jsonl, so nothing propagated). For next run: when several auto-acks land in the same batch, verify each triage line's message_id against the source JSON individually rather than building an array from memory — don't trust a hand-typed lookup table for more than one row at a time.

No do_not_contact, no bounces, no reroutes, nothing routed to the human queue this pass.

Ran the Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 384 operators, 360 complete (up from 381/356 at the 15:17 run). push_sheet.mjs pushed 384 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs drafted 1 reminder (cutoff 7d, 4 deferred by OOO, 0 escalated).

Fired followups.mjs send --all detached via setsid nohup ... & + disown, confirmed it exited almost immediately with "nothing selected" — not a failure: the one reminder drafted this pass (SNB926119738552) is byte-identical (same mastr_nr/to/body → same content hash) to a draft already recorded in followups-sent.jsonl from 2026-08-15, outcome superseded: data already complete. The sender's content-hash dedup correctly treated it as already-resolved and sent nothing new. All 1103 lines in followups-proposed.jsonl now resolve to only 1086 unique draft hashes, and all 1086 are already in followups-sent.jsonl — the proposed queue currently contains no genuinely new, unsent drafts. 0 sent / 0 superseded-this-run (the supersede happened on 08-15, not now) / 0 queued.

For next run: mailbox fully triaged, nothing carries over from the inbox side. findings.csv/ the Sheet are current as of this run (384/360). The dedup-to-zero outcome on the sender this pass is expected given render_reminders.mjs can re-propose a reminder whose underlying case was already closed out (data completed, or a prior send already covered it) — that's fine, but if send --all keeps returning "nothing selected" for several runs in a row while followups-proposed.jsonl keeps growing, it's worth checking whether render_reminders.mjs's dedup-vs-completed-data check has drifted from the reality findings.csv reflects.