de:netzbetreiber-replies

Journal entry written. Final report to the user:

This run's inbox had 3 new replies, all fully triaged and extracted with high-confidence §14a Modul 1/2/3 data: Stadtwerke Zwiesel (SNB924332586844, via a linked Preisblatt), Harz Energie Netz GmbH (SNB924330086940, PDF attachment), and Stadtwerke Munster-Bispingen GmbH (SNB973056451075, PDF attachment). No partials, reroutes, do-not-contact requests, or bounces this pass — nothing needs a human. findings.csv now stands at 387 operators, 363 complete (up from 384/360), pushed to the Sheet successfully.

The follow-up sender was fired detached as required and exited immediately with "nothing selected" — the one reminder drafted this pass (SNB926119738552) is a duplicate of a case already resolved back on 2026-08-15, so 0 sent / 0 queued, which is the correct outcome, not a failure. No warnings to flag.

fetch_mail.mjs: 3 new messages, matched 3/3. pending_mail.mjs: 3 of 3, mailbox fully triaged. Confirmed at the start that the prior (17:30 on 08-24) run's detached send had finished cleanly before this run began: send-last.log showed "nothing selected" and no followups.mjs process was running — nothing newly-landed to report (that run's own journal entry already covered its dedup-to-zero outcome).

Classified: 3 answer_pdf, all fully extracted with clean high-confidence §14a Modul 1/2/3 data. Stadtwerke Zwiesel (SNB924332586844, email gave a link to the Netzentgelte page rather than an attachment; the page listed three PDFs and the plain preisblatt_netznutzung_2026_...pdf had the full §14a table on page 1 — no need to try the fiktiv/Referenzpreisblatt files). Harz Energie Netz GmbH (SNB924330086940, two PDF attachments plus five social-media icon images; the Strom-Preisblatt had the table, the iMSB/Messstellenbetrieb PDF did not and was ignored). Stadtwerke Munster-Bispingen GmbH (SNB973056451075, single PDF attachment, single-page Preisblatt with a compact combined Modul 1/2/3 table).

All three used the by-now-familiar pattern: Modul 1 printed as a negative "Pauschale Reduktion" line (bookkeeping sign, normalized to positive per convention), Modul 2 as the already-reduced Arbeitspreis (not a percentage), and Modul 3 as a HT/NT/ST time-of-use table often restricted to Q1+Q4 only. One noteworthy oddity: Zwiesel labels its off-peak-equivalent window "Niederlasttarif" as 10:00-14:00 (midday) rather than the overnight window every other operator in this campaign has used — quoted straight from the Preisblatt, flagged in the finding's review_note in case a future normalization pass wants to sanity-check it against the operator's site directly. Harz Energie Netz gave brutto figures directly (vat_derived: false) rather than needing 19 0erivation.

No answer_partial, auto_ack, out_of_office, reroute, wrong_entity, do_not_contact, bounce, or question_back this pass — nothing routed to the human queue, nothing added to do_not_contact.txt.

Ran the Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 387 operators, 363 complete (up from 384/360 at the 17:30 08-24 run). push_sheet.mjs pushed 387 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs drafted 1 reminder (cutoff 7d, 2 deferred by OOO, 0 escalated) — SNB926119738552 again, byte-identical to the same draft that has now been dedup'd to zero twice in a row (last time at the 17:30 08-24 run, originally sent+superseded 2026-08-15). Fired followups.mjs send --all detached via setsid nohup ... & + disown; it exited almost immediately with "nothing selected" — confirmed against followups-sent.jsonl line 411, which shows this exact mastr_nr already resolved as superseded: data already complete on 2026-08-15. 0 sent / 0 superseded-this-run / 0 queued.

For next run: mailbox fully triaged, nothing carries over from the inbox side. findings.csv/ the Sheet are current as of this run (387/363). render_reminders.mjs has now re-proposed the same closed-out SNB926119738552 reminder on back-to-back runs (08-24 17:30 and 08-25 05:30) — the sender's dedup keeps correctly catching it, so no harm done, but this is the "several runs in a row" case the prior entry flagged as worth checking: if it keeps recurring, look at whether render_reminders.mjs's silent-≥7d selection logic should be excluding mastr_nrs that already have a superseded/sent outcome in followups-sent.jsonl for the same underlying case, instead of re-deriving purely from findings.csv staleness.