de:wasserversorger-discover
Run 2026-08-25T22-00-00-5413a8, 13d ago.
What the agent said it did
its own words, from the run logJournal entry appended. This run completed the full discovery skill sequence synchronously: two shards researched, merged, verified, and the coverage rebuilt.
Outcome: Processed phase-2a batch 8 (60 singleton municipal units, Rudolstadt→Heide), lifting population coverage from 65.44% to 67.44% (+2.00pp) and municipalities claimed from 6,162 to 6,266. The mandatory post-merge domain-collision check caught and fixed 2 duplicate company mints (Stadtwerke Schaumburg-Lippe, Stadtwerke Heide) before they entered the roster, and correctly left one legitimate parent/subsidiary domain-sharing case (Augsburg/Gersthofen) unmerged per the skill's rule. Phase-2a pool remaining: 756 units / 11.12M people — next run continues from Rees (NRW) downward; full handoff details are in the journal.
Run record
- Run id
2026-08-25T22-00-00-5413a8- Task
- de:wasserversorger-discover
- Workspace
- de
- Phase
- run
- Model
- sonnet
- Started
- 26/08/2026 00:24
- Session
3d0375b9-d8e4-43f4-b21d-96922d556390- Exit code
- 0
- Tokens
- 1,298 in · 26,531 out · 3,080,188 cache read
The journal entry this run wrote
in the journal · matched by run id 5413a8Continued phase-2a from the 18:00 run's exact handoff (verified pool: 822 units / 12.62M people,
next-up list matched exactly — Rudolstadt down to Heide). resolve_singleton.mjs re-checked and
still broken (same TASKDIR/_tasks ENOENT as last run) — skipped the pre-pass again, both
subagents researched directly via WebSearch/WebFetch per the skill's "Per municipality" method.
Took the next 60 singleton units by residual_population descending, 24,852 (Rudolstadt) down to
22,002 (Heide). Split 2 SYNCHRONOUS subagents (p2n / p2o, 30 cities each), each launched with
run_in_background: false and the exact required line ("You may not use the Agent/Task tool...do
not end your turn until output files exist"). Both finished cleanly on the first try — no
delegation, no background children — 5th consecutive batch confirming the fix holds. Non-
overlapping company_id ranges (3410-3459 / 3460-3509).
All 60 resolved, 0 fully unresolved (1 pending_domain: ZV Wasserversorgung Lußhardt for
Waghäusel). 41 new companies initially minted across both shards, 39 after the collision fix (see
below); several reused correctly, including 8 catches in p2n alone where the grep-both-names step
(municipality name, not just candidate company name — last run's fix) stopped a duplicate mint and
pointed at an existing Amt/Verband-level company instead (TAZV Oderaue, AVU AG, MIDEWA, Kreiswerke
Grevenbroich, WBV Harburg, Wasserverband Lausitz, ZWA Saalfeld-Rudolstadt, Stadtwerke Husum).
The mandatory post-merge cross-shard domain-collision check (run across both new shards + the
base roster.jsonl, before consolidate_roster.mjs, as the skill requires) caught 2 real
duplicate mints the subagents' own grep missed, both exact-name collisions where a subagent
independently re-researched and re-minted a company that already existed in the base roster under
a different id: Stadtwerke Schaumburg-Lippe GmbH (existing wv-de-2202, re-minted as
wv-de-3470 for Stadthagen) and Stadtwerke Heide GmbH (existing wv-de-2401, re-minted as
wv-de-3481 for Heide). Both fixed by hand before merging: dropped the 2 duplicate roster rows,
repointed the link rows to the existing ids (Stadthagen → wv-de-2202, Heide → wv-de-2401), and
dropped one harvested Lohe-Rickelshof link under wv-de-3481 that exactly duplicated an existing
link already on wv-de-2401 from 2026-08-21. Same shape as last run's Schleswig/Rathenow catch —
worth stating plainly: the grep-both-names instruction reduces this failure mode, it does not
eliminate it. It's now caught 4 times total (Schleswig, Rathenow, Schaumburg-Lippe, Heide) purely
by the mandatory post-merge check, not by the subagents' own diligence.
One collision correctly left as keep-both, not merged: sw-augsburg.de shared between existing
wv-de-121 (Stadtwerke Augsburg Holding GmbH, Augsburg city, HRB 18093) and newly-minted
wv-de-3432 (Gersthofen's supply, currently delegated to the subsidiary Stadtwerke Augsburg
Wasser GmbH, HRB 18091 — a different Handelsregister number, i.e. a different legal entity, per
Gersthofen's own city page: "Derzeit wird die Stadt Gersthofen aus technischen Gründen über die
Stadtwerke Augsburg versorgt", an explicitly temporary arrangement while Gersthofen's own
Wasserwerk is offline). Per the skill's hard rule ("never auto-merge on a domain collision...
parent/subsidiary pairs share a domain too"), kept both rows rather than guessing whether they're
the same entity — wv-de-121's own notes already flagged its water-operating subsidiary as "not
separately verified," so this is exactly the ambiguity that rule exists for.
Ran the Finish sequence: map_roster.mjs (6,838 links total, 6 unmatched — all administrative-unit
or Ortsteil names with no direct AGS, no_ags_for_this_name, left as unmatched rather than guessed)
→ consolidate_roster.mjs (984 distinct companies, up from 945; 6 shard-level duplicates
resolved by last-shard-wins, all pre-existing from batches before this one — verified none came
from this run's own p2n/p2o shards) → coverage.mjs → build_gv_layer.mjs. Population coverage
65.44% → 67.44% (+2.00pp); municipalities claimed 6,162 → 6,266 (+104 — above the 60 seeded
because harvested member-list links from Wasserverband Lausitz, TAZV Oderaue, ZWA
Saalfeld-Rudolstadt, ZVO Ostharz and others claimed extra municipalities beyond the 60 targets).
Domain-collision check after the fix: down to the same 2 known/accepted hits — emkendorf.de
(pre-existing since 2026-08-19) and the new but legitimate keep-both sw-augsburg.de case above.
Other traps re-confirmed: wholesale-vs-retail splits at Impressum level (Kreiswasserwerke Olpe wholesale / Bigge Energie GmbH & Co. KG retail for both Olpe and Attendorn; Harzwasserwerke wholesale / EWA Ronnenberg retail; WAZV Bode-Wipper for Staßfurt and a separate Zweckverband for Burg, in both cases ruled out the city's own energy-only Stadtwerke as NOT the water supplier); one name-collision correctly guarded (Wertheim, Baden-Württemberg vs. Kreuzwertheim, Bayern — different Zweckverbände); one flagged-not-guessed conflict left for a future reconciliation pass rather than picked: Ditfurt now has two candidate suppliers (existing TAZV Vorharz block-claim vs. a new ZVO-via-VG-Vorharz candidate from this batch), recorded as two separate medium-confidence rows.
Phase-2a pool remaining: 756 units / 11.12M people (next up: Rees 21,913, Gauting 21,860, Gardelegen 21,822, Zülpich 21,780, Schwetzingen 21,767, Sonthofen 21,734, Germersheim 21,715, Lindlar 21,615, Wipperfürth 21,604, Osterode am Harz 21,598).
For next run: continue phase-2a from Rees down, same method. Next free company_id range
starts at wv-de-3481 (this run used 3412-3436 in p2n, non-contiguous, with 3437-3459 unused/free;
and 3460-3480 in p2o after the 2 retirements — don't reuse 3470/3481, minted then retired this run).
Keep the explicit "you may not use the Agent/Task tool" line verbatim in every subagent prompt — 5th
consecutive clean batch. Keep grepping the existing roster on both municipality name and candidate
company name before minting, but treat that as risk-reduction, not a guarantee — the mandatory
post-merge domain-collision check is still catching real duplicates every batch and remains the
actual safety net; never skip it. resolve_singleton.mjs remains broken (TASKDIR/_tasks
ENOENT) — still worth a real fix or removal, not blocking since the direct-research path works.
Log
data/logs/de-wasserversorger-discover-2026-08-25T22-00-00-5413a8.log · 2,402 bytesstdout
{"type":"result","subtype":"success","is_error":false,"api_error_status":null,"duration_ms":1467308,"duration_api_ms":2885097,"ttft_ms":3270,"ttft_stream_ms":2082,"time_to_request_ms":206,"num_turns":38,"result":"Journal entry appended. This run completed the full discovery skill sequence synchronously: two shards researched, merged, verified, and the coverage rebuilt.\n\n**Outcome:** Processed phase-2a batch 8 (60 singleton municipal units, Rudolstadt→Heide), lifting population coverage from 65.44% to 67.44% (+2.00pp) and municipalities claimed from 6,162 to 6,266. The mandatory post-merge domain-collision check caught and fixed 2 duplicate company mints (Stadtwerke Schaumburg-Lippe, Stadtwerke Heide) before they entered the roster, and correctly left one legitimate parent/subsidiary domain-sharing case (Augsburg/Gersthofen) unmerged per the skill's rule. Phase-2a pool remaining: 756 units / 11.12M people — next run continues from Rees (NRW) downward; full handoff details are in the journal.","stop_reason":"end_turn","session_id":"3d0375b9-d8e4-43f4-b21d-96922d556390","total_cost_usd":14.570323900000005,"usage":{"input_tokens":1298,"cache_creation_input_tokens":88915,"cache_read_input_tokens":3080188,"output_tokens":26531,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":88915,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0},"inference_geo":"not_available","iterations":[{"input_tokens":2,"output_tokens":315,"cache_read_input_tokens":110109,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3110,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":3110},"type":"message"}],"speed":"standard"},"modelUsage":{"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001":{"inputTokens":1875021,"outputTokens":57536,"cacheReadInputTokens":0,"cacheCreationInputTokens":0,"webSearchRequests":96,"costUSD":3.1227009999999984,"contextWindow":200000,"maxOutputTokens":32000},"claude-sonnet-5":{"inputTokens":14429,"outputTokens":177071,"cacheReadInputTokens":22021978,"cacheCreationInputTokens":517765,"webSearchRequests":0,"costUSD":11.4476229,"contextWindow":1000000,"maxOutputTokens":64000}},"permission_denials":[],"terminal_reason":"completed","fast_mode_state":"off","uuid":"69e1daa4-7aa1-47c9-b58b-fe46778353cd"}