de:netzbetreiber-replies

Processed 2 replies: Stadtwerke Bietigheim-Bissingen gave a full §14a extraction (Modul 1/2/3, standard Q1+Q4 pattern) via their Preisblatt PDF, and Stadtwerke Ochtrup asked "what exactly do you want to know?" — routed to the human queue as question_back rather than auto-answered. Finish steps ran clean: findings now 416 operators/397 complete, sheet pushed, 0 new reminders (mailbox fully triaged), and followups.mjs send --all found nothing queued ("nothing selected", exited immediately — the 11:30 run's LEW reroute was already sent). WARNINGS: needs-human queue is now 4 items (Trostberg refusal, Radolfzell question_back, TenneT wrong_entity, and new: Ochtrup question_back) — no bounces or do_not_contact this pass.

Fetched 2 new messages (2 matched, 0 unmatched). Processed the full worklist, one record appended per message as required.

answer_complete (1, via link→current-year PDF): Stadtwerke Bietigheim-Bissingen (SW·BB, SNB910950265032) replied to Stefanie's 3rd/last reminder ("letzte Mahnung") — their prior replies had landed in spam. Link to the Netzinformationen page led to stromnetzentgelte_2026.pdf (Stand 31.12.2025), read directly, all three modules found: Modul 1 122,95 EUR/a netto (146,31 brutto, VAT-derived), Modul 2 2,97 ct/kWh netto (3,53 brutto, VAT-derived), Modul 3 standard Q1+Q4-only pattern (Niedrigtarif 01:30–05:15 @2,97 ct/kWh, Hochtarif 16:45–19:30 @9,70 ct/kWh, Standardtarif 7,43 ct/kWh otherwise) — no deviation from the usual seasonal split.

question_back (1, new pattern worth noting): Stadtwerke Ochtrup (SNB934961797092) replied to a reminder with only "was möchten Sie genau wissen?" (what exactly would you like to know?), offering to help but not answering. The original 3-item list (Modul 1/2/3) was in Stefanie's initial mail but the reply chain shows it was internally forwarded (info@ → Kockmann) — plausibly the specifics got lost in that hop. Classified as question_back and routed to human queue rather than auto-drafting a clarifying follow-up: per prior precedent (isb-arneburg phone request, Radolfzell's "send MaLo/Zählernummer" ask), this task family treats any reply that asks us a question — even a cooperative one — as needing Stefanie's judgment rather than an automated restatement, to keep the "never argue with question_back" rule from becoming a judgment call the agent makes for itself.

No do_not_contact, bounce, answer_partial, reroute, wrong_entity, or out_of_office this pass. No CAPTCHAs, forms, or hand-composed mail — research and link/PDF extraction only, per country hard rules 1–3.

Ran the Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 416 operators, 397 complete (up from 415/396 at the 11:30 run). push_sheet.mjs pushed 416 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs drafted 0 fresh reminders (cutoff 7d; 2 deferred by OOO, 65 escalated to phone queue) — mailbox fully triaged, legitimate zero. Ran followups.mjs send --all detached via setsid nohup ... & + disown; it printed nothing selected and exited within ~2s on its own — confirmed via ps aux that no process remained running. Nothing was queued this run (the LEW reroute from the 11:30 run was already sent by that run's own detached send, confirmed via followups-sent.jsonl/send-last.log at the start of this run: "1 sent, 0 superseded").

For next run: needs-human queue now has 4 items: Trostberg refusal, Radolfzell question_back, TenneT wrong_entity claim (all unchanged, still awaiting Stefanie), and new: Ochtrup's "was möchten Sie genau wissen?" — worth Stefanie deciding whether a plain restatement of the 3-module ask is safe to auto-send here (recipient seems cooperative, not skeptical) or whether it should stay hand-routed like Radolfzell's. Jira SVP-4476 (SNB916151866986) unchanged, still closed twice with no data. Windsbach (SNB957988771050) OOO-deferred until 2026-08-31, unchanged.