0% 5h quota used · resets in 2h live · 08/09/2026 12:14 CEST

de:netzbetreiber-replies

Run 2026-08-31T11-30-00-69c01c, 8d ago.

Outcome ok
stopped: completed
Cost $1.94
API-equivalent
Took 6m
budget 75m
Turns 42
budget 250

What the agent said it did

its own words, from the run log

This run's netzbetreiber-replies pass is complete: 9 messages triaged (3 full §14a extractions — Stromnetz Weiden, Stadtwerke Munster-Bispingen, EG Wittmund; 2 answer_partial with follow-ups drafted after their linked documents turned out to contain no §14a pricing data — Stadtwerke Windsbach and wesernetz; 2 Bayernwerk auto-acks; 1 irrelevant spam; 1 duplicate). Findings now stand at 440 operators (424 complete, +1 net this pass), Sheet pushed cleanly, and phone-queue escalations ticked down 202→201 for a second straight pass.

The last pass's send (2026-08-29 reroute to Stadtwerke Herne) had nothing to follow it for 5 passes — this run ended that streak: the sender was fired detached and, by end of turn, had already sent both new follow-ups (to Windsbach and wesernetz) asking them to supply the actual Preisblatt since their previously-linked documents turned out to be off-topic (an old 2018 reference sheet and a technical-requirements PDF, respectively). Journal updated with details, including a newly-observed fetch_reply_doc.mjs failure mode worth a human's attention: it can silently fetch a topically-wrong document and report success.

Run record

Run id
2026-08-31T11-30-00-69c01c
Task
de:netzbetreiber-replies
Workspace
de
Phase
run
Queued for a slot
no wait — a slot was free
Model
sonnet
Started
31/08/2026 13:36
Session
7d9505fd-ccd8-4848-98cd-abcacab308b9
Exit code
0
Tokens
64 in · 25,751 out · 2,774,280 cache read

The journal entry this run wrote

in the journal · matched by run id 69c01c

Read CLAUDE.md and journal tail, then SKILL.md in full. fetch_mail.mjs → 9 new messages, 8 matched, 1 unmatched (irrelevant). fetch_browser.mjs → nothing queued this pass. Confirmed the long-stuck SNB927533168369 fetch-queue blocker (7+ passes, first flagged 08-29 17:30) resolved itself by 08-31 10:18 (a prior same-day run's browser fetch succeeded) and was already extracted before this run started — pending_docs.mjs found 0 unread documents, nothing left to do there. pending_mail.mjs → 9 of 9 pending, all processed.

3 full extractions via fetch_reply_doc.mjs / direct attachment: Stromnetz Weiden (SNB986482940686, 1 hop, Preisblatt marked "vorläufig"), Stadtwerke Munster-Bispingen (SNB973056451075, 1 hop), Energiegenossenschaft für Wittmund (SNB914735995145, PDF attachment directly — a second message minutes later from the same sender/mastr_nr was a duplicate with only inline signature images, no new data, filed as action: none).

New failure mode for fetch_reply_doc.mjs: successful fetch, wrong document. Two cases (Stadtwerke Windsbach SNB957988771050, wesernetz SNB985704986426) where the script exited 0 and saved a PDF, but the document had no §14a Modul 1/2/3 data at all — Windsbach's highest-scored candidate (tarife-gebuehren/netzentgelte, score 70) led 2 hops to a 2018 "vermiedene Netzentgelte" reference sheet (dezentrale Einspeisung, unrelated concept sharing NEMoG terminology), while the operator's own text pointed at a downloadcenter link (scored 0, never tried since the higher-scored candidate already "succeeded"); wesernetz's steuVE FAQ page's only document was a technical-requirements (TMA) PDF, no pricing anywhere. This is different from the documented fetch-queue.jsonl/hop_failed failure mode — the script has no way to know a retrieved PDF is topically wrong, only that some document was found. Handled by treating as answer_partial (not answer_pdf): no findings row (nothing to record, all fields would be null), drafted a short followup naming the mismatch and re-asking for the actual Preisblatt, queued through the normal followups-proposed.jsonl path. Worth flagging to a human: the ranker's "stop at first document found" behavior has no semantic check, so a bad top-ranked candidate can silently starve a better-ranked one from ever being tried.

Stromnetz Weiden's Modul 3 quarter-applicability is unreadable from the text extraction — the Preisblatt shows a color legend ("keine Anwendung"/"Anwendung") next to the 4 quarter rows but the PDF-to-text path drops the per-row color, so which quarters actually apply could not be determined. Recorded the Modul 3 rates and off-peak windows with review_note flagging this as an open ambiguity — worth a human visually opening that specific PDF if this operator's data matters before a normalization sweep. First time this exact ambiguity (present legend, absent mapping) has been hit in this campaign; prior quarter-restriction cases always had the quarters stated in plain text.

Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 440 operators, 424 complete (was 439/423 at 08-31 05:30; +1/+1 net — 3 new full extractions minus one that must have already been partial-complete before this pass, consistent with the pattern noted in the prior run's entry). push_sheet.mjs pushed 440 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs → 0 fresh reminders (cutoff 7d, deferred by OOO: 3), phone-queue escalations 202 → 201, second consecutive decrease after the 193→203 climb — trend now reversing, keep watching. Mailbox confirmed fully triaged (0 of 0 pending) before firing the sender.

Sender fired detached (setsid nohup … &, confirmed reparented, PID visible in ps aux after launch) with 2 new drafts queued (both replies asking Windsbach/wesernetz for the actual Preisblatt after their linked documents turned out to lack §14a data). Both had already sent by the time this run's turn ended: SNB957988771050 → [email protected] and SNB985704986426 → [email protected], per followups-sent.jsonl. This ends the 5-pass content-free streak (last prior real send was 2026-08-29 11:31, reroute to stadtwerke-herne.de).

For next run: watch for a reply to either of today's two "your link had no data" followups — if Windsbach or wesernetz still doesn't produce actual Modul figures, both may need the human queue. Phone-queue escalation count ticked down 202→201 this pass, second decrease in a row — worth noting if the trend continues or reverses. needs-human queue presumed unchanged at 6 items — not touched this pass. Consider flagging to a human the fetch_reply_doc.mjs "wrong document, exit 0" failure mode described above — it currently looks identical to a successful extraction in the log and is only caught by a human/agent actually reading the retrieved PDF's content.

Log

data/logs/de-netzbetreiber-replies-2026-08-31T11-30-00-69c01c.log · 4,221 bytes
stdout
{"duration_api_ms":377156,"stop_reason":"end_turn","session_id":"7d9505fd-ccd8-4848-98cd-abcacab308b9","total_cost_usd":1.295204,"usage":{"input_tokens":64,"cache_creation_input_tokens":120372,"cache_read_input_tokens":2774280,"output_tokens":25751,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":11448},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":120372,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0},"inference_geo":"not_available","iterations":[{"input_tokens":2,"output_tokens":448,"cache_read_input_tokens":141834,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2474,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":2474},"type":"message"}],"speed":"standard"},"modelUsage":{"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001":{"inputTokens":1137,"outputTokens":17,"cacheReadInputTokens":0,"cacheCreationInputTokens":0,"webSearchRequests":0,"costUSD":0.001222,"contextWindow":200000,"maxOutputTokens":32000,"canonicalModel":"claude-haiku-4-5","provider":"firstParty","costBasis":"list"},"claude-sonnet-5":{"inputTokens":64,"outputTokens":25751,"cacheReadInputTokens":2774280,"cacheCreationInputTokens":120372,"webSearchRequests":0,"costUSD":1.293982,"contextWindow":1000000,"maxOutputTokens":64000,"canonicalModel":"claude-sonnet-5","provider":"firstParty","costBasis":"list"}},"permission_denials":[],"terminal_reason":"completed","fast_mode_state":"off","fast_mode_disabled_reason":"sdk_opt_in_required","subagent_stats":{"spawned":0,"requested":{"background":0,"foreground":0,"unset":0},"started_in_background":0,"max_depth":0,"spawned_by_subagents":0,"completed":0,"failed":0,"killed":{"parent":0,"user":0,"system":0},"refused":{"depth_limit":0,"concurrency_limit":0,"budget":0},"by_type":{}},"is_error":false,"num_turns":42,"subtype":"success","api_error_status":null,"result":"This run's netzbetreiber-replies pass is complete: 9 messages triaged (3 full §14a extractions — Stromnetz Weiden, Stadtwerke Munster-Bispingen, EG Wittmund; 2 answer_partial with follow-ups drafted after their linked documents turned out to contain no §14a pricing data — Stadtwerke Windsbach and wesernetz; 2 Bayernwerk auto-acks; 1 irrelevant spam; 1 duplicate). Findings now stand at 440 operators (424 complete, +1 net this pass), Sheet pushed cleanly, and phone-queue escalations ticked down 202→201 for a second straight pass.\n\nThe last pass's send (2026-08-29 reroute to Stadtwerke Herne) had nothing to follow it for 5 passes — this run ended that streak: the sender was fired detached and, by end of turn, had already sent both new follow-ups (to Windsbach and wesernetz) asking them to supply the actual Preisblatt since their previously-linked documents turned out to be off-topic (an old 2018 reference sheet and a technical-requirements PDF, respectively). Journal updated with details, including a newly-observed `fetch_reply_doc.mjs` failure mode worth a human's attention: it can silently fetch a topically-wrong document and report success.","ttft_ms":3052,"type":"result","duration_ms":389303,"uuid":"fdc3b4b2-6175-4e25-be3f-7548b3fdc5b6","ttft_stream_ms":2185,"time_to_request_ms":339,"queued_turn_count":0}