de:netzbetreiber-replies

This run processed 4 replies: 2 full §14a extractions (Stadtwerke Windsbach and Stadtwerke Zeven, bringing findings to 441 operators/425 complete), 1 reroute drafted (nvb Nordhorner Versorgungsbetriebe, resending our inquiry to a named contact), and 1 auto-ack noted. Findings/outreach were pushed to the sheet, 6 fresh reminder drafts were rendered, and the deterministic sender was fired detached with those 7 new drafts queued (confirmed reparented to PID 1). One flag for a human: the phone-queue escalation count jumped sharply from 201 to 304 this pass, worth checking whether that's organic or a bug.

Read CLAUDE.md and journal tail, then SKILL.md in full. fetch_mail.mjs → 4 new messages, 4 matched, 0 unmatched. fetch_browser.mjs → nothing queued. pending_docs.mjs → the same 2 stale documents from the 11:30 run (Windsbach's 2018 "vermiedene Netzentgelte" sheet, wesernetz's TMA PDF) — both were already correctly handled last pass as answer_partial/no findings row (genuinely no §14a data in either file), so left untouched; they'll keep showing up in pending_docs.mjs forever since the script has no way to know that "missing" is permanent here, not pending. pending_mail.mjs → 4 of 4 pending, all processed.

2 full extractions:

• Stadtwerke Windsbach (SNB957988771050) — David Arnold sent a corrected direct Preisblatt link after this morning's "your linked doc had no §14a data" follow-up; full Modul 1/2/3 table on page 2 ("Preisblatt 3"). Modul 1: 118,38 EUR/a; Modul 2: 2,73 ct/kWh; Modul 3 time-variable with an explicit quarter-applicability table (Q1 ja, Q2 nein, Q3 nein, Q4 ja) — unlike Stromnetz Weiden's unreadable color-legend case from the 11:30 run, this one stated Q-applicability as plain ja/nein text, so no ambiguity.
• Stadtwerke Zeven (SNB980783618473) — first-ever reply, after the final reminder. PDF table extraction interleaved columns badly (Grundpreis/AP/Pauschale Reduktion split across non-adjacent lines, with the same "-117,18" value printed twice for Modul 1 and Modul 3 "wie Modul 1"). Reconstructed via standard §14a Preisblatt layout conventions rather than guessing; flagged review_note for a human to visually confirm the table if this operator matters — confidence medium, not high, because of the extraction ambiguity (values are stated in the source, just awkwardly ordered by the PDF-to-text path).

1 reroute: nvb Nordhorner Versorgungsbetriebe (SNB945532057606) — Ewald van Faassen (Leitung Technische Planung) said he can't trace our original inquiry internally and asked us to resend it directly to him. Treated as reroute per the skill's definition (operator names a specific new contact) rather than question_back — nothing to argue, just a resend of the standard 3-module ask to [email protected], queued through followups-proposed.jsonl with reroute: true, no in_reply_to.

1 auto_ack: Bayernwerk (SNB986363918520) ticket confirmation (Vorgangs-Nr. 8613870315), action wait.

Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 441 operators, 425 complete (was 440/424 at 11:30; +1 operator, +1 complete — consistent with the "one extraction was already partial-complete" pattern noted in prior entries; net movement is smaller than the 2 raw extractions because one of them likely just completed an already-partial row). push_sheet.mjs pushed 441 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs → 6 fresh reminder drafts (cutoff 7d, deferred by OOO: 3), phone-queue escalations 201 → 304, a sharp jump breaking the two-run 201→203→201 pattern noted previously — worth a human look at what pushed ~100 operators past the phone-queue threshold in one pass (possibly a batch of same-day-reminder-eligible operators all crossing the cutoff together rather than a bug, but flagging since it's a much bigger jump than any prior single-run delta). Mailbox confirmed fully triaged (0 of 0 pending) before firing the sender.

Sender fired detached (setsid nohup … &, confirmed reparented to PPID 1 via ps -o pid,ppid,cmd) with 7 new drafts queued this pass (1 reroute + 6 reminders); followups-proposed.jsonl has 1157 total lines vs 1132 in followups-sent.jsonl, so ~25 drafts await the sender's per-draft freshness guards (some of those 25 are likely older stale/superseded entries, not all fresh). Not waited on; results land in followups-sent.jsonl for the next run to report.

For next run: watch for replies to Zeven's re-ask if the medium-confidence table reconstruction needs correcting, and to nvb's resent inquiry. Investigate the phone-queue 201→304 jump — first thing to check before assuming it's organic. do_not_contact.txt still has exactly 1 entry (SNB958337664054), unchanged. needs-human queue presumed unchanged, not touched this pass.