de:netzbetreiber-replies

This run's netzbetreiber-replies pass processed 2 new messages, both from Gemeindewerke Nüdlingen delivering a complete §14a Preisblatt (Modul 1: 119,05 EUR/a; Modul 2: 2,76 ct/kWh; Modul 3 time-variable) — its first-ever data, now recorded. I also closed a longstanding gap flagged by two prior runs: read wesernetz Bremerhaven's stuck "pending doc" in full (confirmed it's a hardware spec with no pricing) and recorded a null findings row citing it so it stops being re-flagged forever. Findings now stand at 443 operators / 426 complete; the sheet was pushed, 0 new reminders drafted, mailbox was fully triaged, and the sender was fired detached but found nothing new to send (previous pass's 7 drafts confirmed already sent, 0 superseded). No bounces, do_not_contact, or unmatched mail this pass.

Read CLAUDE.md and journal tail, then SKILL.md in full. Prior send (08-31 17:30 pass) had finished cleanly per send-last.log: 7 sent, 0 superseded. fetch_mail.mjs → 2 new messages, 2 matched, 0 unmatched. fetch_browser.mjs → nothing queued. pending_docs.mjs → the wesernetz Bremerhaven TMA PDF still listed (the same one flagged stale by the 08-31 11:30/17:30 runs) — read it in full this time and confirmed definitively it is a hardware/wiring spec (Technische Mindestanforderungen for steuVE installs) with zero Modul 1/2/3 EUR/ct figures, not a Preisblatt. Appended a findings.jsonl record for SNB985704986426 with all fields null, source.detail citing the file's basename — pending_docs.mjs builds its citedFiles set from that field, so this closes the "keeps showing up forever" gap two prior runs flagged rather than just re-noting it again. Operator still awaits the actual Preisblatt (follow-up already sent 08-31).

1 full extraction: Gemeindewerke Nüdlingen (SNB981336194529) — Thomas Schäfer replied twice, 3 minutes apart, to our final reminder, each with an identical Preisblatt PDF (i2713/i2714, same content, no diff found on comparison). Full Modul 1/2/3 table: Modul 1 pauschale Reduzierung 119,05 EUR/a netto (Einrichtung der Steuerbarkeit 67,23 + Stabilitätsprämie 51,83, cited BK8-22/ 010-A Ziffer 3.3.1 Rz. 92); Modul 2 Arbeitspreis 2,76 ct/kWh netto; Modul 3 zeitvariabel with 3 tariff steps (Standard 6,91 / Hochlast 10,55 / Niedriglast 2,76 ct/kWh) that only differentiate in Q1/Q4 (Q2/Q3 flat Standard rate all day) — both messages recorded as separate answer_complete triage rows and findings.jsonl records (per-message per skill step 4), first-ever data for this operator, no follow-up needed since all fields are now filled.

Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 443 operators, 426 complete (was 441/425 at 08-31 17:30; +2 operators is wesernetz's now-recorded-but-still-null row plus Nüdlingen, +1 complete is Nüdlingen). push_sheet.mjs pushed 443 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs → 0 new reminder drafts (cutoff 7d, deferred by OOO: 2, phone-queue 303 — down slightly from 304, consistent with Nüdlingen dropping off the silent-operator list now that it answered; the 08-31 304 jump looks to have been organic after all, no further anomaly this pass). Mailbox confirmed fully triaged (0 of 0 pending) before firing the sender.

Sender fired detached (setsid nohup … &); it exited almost immediately with "nothing selected" — followups-proposed.jsonl (1157) vs followups-sent.jsonl (1139) still shows an 18-line gap, same as before this pass, but the sender dedupes by a hash of mastr_nr|to|body against already-sent drafts, so those 18 lines are apparently already-sent duplicates in the proposed queue, not a stuck backlog — worth a future run double-checking with followups.mjs list if that gap persists across several more passes without ever producing a send.

For next run: watch for a third message from Nüdlingen's Thomas Schäfer (he replied twice unprompted, so a duplicate third send is plausible) — de-dupe on triage rather than re-extracting. do_not_contact.txt still has exactly 1 entry, unchanged. No new WARNINGS this pass; no bounces, no do_not_contact, no unmatched mail.