de:netzbetreiber-replies

This run triaged 14 replies: 9 full §14a extractions (SW Unna, Stadtwerke Wedel — recovering a lost 14.08 first-round reply that had never been triaged, BASF InfraService Lausitz, Gemeindewerke Kirkel, Sulz am Neckar, Energieversorgung Schmid, Bad Rodach, Schneverdingen-Neuenkirchen, Ludwigslust-Grabow), 1 low-confidence partial (Radolfzell, sourced from supplier order forms rather than the operator's own Preisblatt), 2 sent to the human queue (Metzingen, Energienetze Bayern — both pointed to their homepage with no usable document found), and 1 reroute (Oberkirch). export_findings.mjs moved 452→461 operators (435→444 complete); push_sheet.mjs and render_reminders.mjs ran clean (0 reminders due, mailbox fully triaged). The deterministic sender fired detached and finished within seconds — only the Oberkirch reroute was fresh, sent successfully (1 sent, 0 superseded).

Read CLAUDE.md and journal tail (the 05:30 run's summary of this same campaign). fetch_mail.mjs → 14 new messages, all matched. fetch_browser.mjs → nothing queued at start. pending_docs.mjs → empty. pending_mail.mjs → 14 of 14 selected, all processed.

9 full §14a extractions, all high confidence: SW Unna (SNB944150243392, data from an annotated screenshot embedded in the reply, not a PDF — operators don't always send documents), Stadtwerke Wedel (SNB975283859389, see below), BASF InfraService & Solutions Lausitz (SNB914411628732, direct PDF link), Gemeindewerke Kirkel (SNB969688824103, PDF attached directly), Stromversorgung Sulz am Neckar (SNB954776773166, inline answers + PDF link), Energieversorgung Schmid/enwicon (SNB925831583235, PDF via a 2-hop landing page), Stadtwerke Bad Rodach (SNB967186419241, 8-part Preisblatt PDF, §14a in part 6), Stadtwerke Schneverdingen-Neuenkirchen (SNB950028563172, via the statutory portal enwg-veroeffentlichungen.de), Stadtwerke Ludwigslust-Grabow (SNB928200943784, see below).

A genuinely lost first-round reply, recovered. Stadtwerke Wedel's reply this pass opened with "über Ihre erneute E-Mail bin ich etwas verwundert, da ich Ihre ursprüngliche Anfrage bereits am selben Tag beantwortet hatte" and reattached their original answer from 14.08.2026 — a full, clean 3-module answer. Neither triage.jsonl nor findings.jsonl had any row for this mastr_nr before this run, so that first reply never reached triage (address/thread mismatch on [email protected] vs the current [email protected] sender — the 14.08 message was addressed to the old address). Treated as a first extraction rather than a duplicate; worth a human checking whether other selectra.com-addressed first-round replies from mid-August are sitting unindexed the same way — this one only surfaced because the operator happened to resend it.

hunt_preisblatt.mjs's automatic ranking picked the wrong document, twice in one operator. Ludwigslust-Grabow's reply said only "auf unserer Homepage" with no link. hunt_preisblatt.mjs --mastr against their verified domain returned a real, current, on-topic-scoring PDF — Preisblatt-2026-§-118-EnWG.pdf — but it was the §118 EnWG ÜNB-Zuschuss transparency notice, not a §14a Preisblatt; it has no Modul 1/2/3 content at all despite scoring above MIN_DOC_SCORE. Caught by actually reading it before trusting the filename. A manual site search (curl … | grep -oiE 'href="[^"]*(preisblatt|netzentgelt|14a)[^"]*"') found the real one (Preisblatt-fuer-Strom-Netzkunden-...-ab-01.01.2026.pdf), which was then re-run through hunt_preisblatt.mjs --mastr … --url … so the host check still applied before reading it — never curled directly per the country rule. Any run trusting hunt_preisblatt.mjs's top hit without opening it risks silently mis-extracting from a same-domain, same-year, wrong-topic PDF — Preisblatt-shaped filenames aren't proof of §14a content this year, because 2026 is also the year of the one-off §118 ÜNB-Zuschuss publication mandate, which produces documents that look identical by name pattern.

1 low-confidence partial, recorded rather than skipped: Stadtwerke Radolfzell's Kundencenter attached two supplier order forms (Auftragsblatt Kombiprodukt Modul 1 / Modul 2) instead of their own network-operator Preisblatt. Modul 1 is stated as an approximation ("ca. 143,81 €"); Modul 2's 3,91 ct/kWh is a post-reduction bundled-tariff line, not confirmed equal to a standalone Modul-2 rate — left modul2_netto_ct_kwh null rather than infer it, flagged confidence: low with a review_note for a human to reconcile against the real Preisblatt if it surfaces later.

2 sent to human_queue, both because the operator pointed at "our homepage" with no link and the site itself didn't yield a document even after a targeted attempt: Metzingen (SNB961448362368, fetch_browser.mjs rendered their Netzentgelte page but found no downloadable link) and Energienetze Bayern GmbH/SNB994111700501 (hunt_preisblatt.mjs --mastr against their verified energienetze-bayern.com hit the known Cloudflare WAF — consistent with this operator's 2026-07-22 enrichment note — and rendered with no document link either).

1 reroute, sent same-pass: Stadtwerke Oberkirch's Kundenservice asked us to write to [email protected] instead of the address we'd used; drafted and appended to followups-proposed.jsonl with reroute: true.

Finish steps: export_findings.mjs → 452→461 operators, 435→444 complete (+9, matching the 9 full extractions exactly). push_sheet.mjs pushed 461 Findings + 869 Outreach rows without error. render_reminders.mjs → 0 reminder drafts, mailbox fully triaged so this is a real "nothing due" result (2 still deferred by OOO), not a self-skip. followups.mjs send --all fired detached via setsid nohup … & disown, confirmed running (PID visible via ps aux), and finished within seconds — only 1 fresh draft existed (the Oberkirch reroute above), sent successfully per send-last.log: "1 sent, 0 superseded, 0 still queued". followups-sent.jsonl 1505→1506 lines.

For next run: do_not_contact.txt unchanged. No bounces this pass. Open items for a human: (1) the Wedel selectra.com-address gap above — worth checking mid-August replies more broadly; (2) Metzingen and Energienetze Bayern in the human queue (both need a person to locate the Preisblatt manually); (3) the Radolfzell low-confidence Modul 1/2 figures should be reconciled against their real Preisblatt if it turns up; (4) the two 2026-09-01-run host-mismatch operators (Peißenberg SNB985871274975/gwp-netz.de, Netze Calw SNB976371748981/netze-calw.de) are still unresolved, unchanged since the last report; (5) the Viernheim/Heddesheim entity-relationship question from the 05:30 run is also still open.